Skip to content

 

Fostering key-solutions towards environmental sustainability

After the successful collaboration between the Future Forest Initiative (FFI) and the European Landowner’s Organization (ELO) in 2023, the 25th of March 2024 marked our first co-organized conference about "Key solutions for environmental sustainability”. Paving the way towards a more sustainable future, this year’s conference in Brussels focused mainly on three key topics: Innovative uses of forest biomass, the monitoring of biodiversity and the preservation of soil health.

Panel 1: The first panel examined new ways to use forest biomass. Discussing issues such as the establishment of an alignment between economic and environmental interests, the speakers came up with diverse approaches, giving an insight on how different countries in Europe try to find a sustainable “sweet spot” by looking into different fields. Consequently, Elina Kalela appealed to “open our eyes to other directions when we want to fight climate change and try to find synergies”.

Panel 2: Besides the management of forests, the valuation of their ecosystem services was of interest in the second panel. By discussing new ways to monitor biodiversity, the speakers did not only picture the versatility of possible parameters for its measurement, but also presented how the selection of accurate indicators offers an opportunity for new business models. Considering the latest greenwashing scandals revolving around carbon offsetting, the speakers underscored biodiversity’s superiority to really tackle the value of ecosystems and its chance to regain trust among the markets.

Panel 3: The third panel gave insights into the urgency to tackle land degradation. Specifically, Joséphine de Chazournes referred to the importance of education to foster the awareness of and willingness to combat today’s environmental issues within the younger generations. In this regard, Theresa Luber underlined this statement by asserting that it needs funds to strengthen current ecosystem services, since costs rise the later action is taken.

Startup pitches: Subsequently, several startups from the Future Forest Initiative’s accelerator program and network presented potential approaches tackling the identified core issues. They were a good example of how a need for change fosters innovation. First, Skyseed showed how it tackles the current challenges with the help of drone-supported seeding. Afterwards, 44.moles presented its method to accurately measure carbon sequestration and offsetting. Finally, Eco:fibr showed how pineapple production in Costa Rica offers opportunities to establish a more sustainable paper industry in Europe and America.

Closing this year’s conference, the more than 70 attendees, representing diverse organizations from across Europe, gathered for drinks, to enjoy a more personal exchange. The conference was a pre-event to the Forum for the Future of Agriculture (FFA), a leading European gathering focusing on agriculture, food security and environmental health. We as FFI thank the European Landowner’s Organization (ELO) for this opportunity to showcase its goals and startups it supports.

 

Q&A 

Due to the versatility of the topics and the wide range of expertises covered, several questions from the Q&A sessions could not be considerated. Therefore, we collected some of the hot topics the audience were particularily interested in and obtained the corresponding answers from the speakers concerned. 

Remaining questions panel 1

How to manage forests in order to harvest for products and store carbon in the forest at the same time? Isn't the instrumental view on biomass problematic for a sustainable future? Ecosystem equilibrium is threatened by the productivist vision on our environment - how to tackle this?

Earth below the atmosphere and above the ground can be considered as a closed tank, where chemical reactions and changes of the state of matter of elementary carbon take place continuously. When the in feed of fossile carbon (from the ground) into this „tank“ is bigger than the total storage capacity of the „tank“, the excess carbon starts to accumulate in form of gas into the atmosphere. Therefore, the first thing to do in order to reduce the accumulation of CO2 into the atmosphere is a) reduce the intake of fossile carbon into the system (as liquid oil or solid coal) b) optimize the storage capacity of elementary carbon in solid/liquid form above ground and its feed back into the ground. 

Forests are playing a significant role in transporting and transforming elementary carbon from gas (CO2) into solid carbon containing substances. And storing these substances in various places (soil, tree itself). The speed and volume of this transformation is linearly depending on the growth rate of the tree. Only growing, living cells participate in the photosynthesis reaction resulting in capturing carbon from gas into solid substances. Tree, as any other creatures  containing living cells, has an determined life time. It is not living forever. As all living cells, the tree loses its capacity to grow and renew when it gets old. This results in slowing down and finally totally stopping the growth. Due to this process, a tree which has reached a critical age is not transforming and storing carbon any more. It progressively becomes so weak that it falls down and starts to compost. During the decomposition of the organic substances of the tree, CO2 is released in form of gas and the tree becomes a source of Carbon emission.


Optimal capturing and storing of Carbon in Forest is reached by 1) keeping the forest healthy and vital; prevent the whole forest to grow over-aged, to „retire“ at once (exact definition of „retirement“ age is varying due to climate and soil conditions; in CE and Northern Europe approximately 45-75 yrs). 2) Replant retired trees with youngsters.


These two guidelines happen to be exactly the same as for well managed commercial forest. The two, store carbon and commercially utilize the forest DO NOT GO AGAINST EACH OTHER. They call for exactly same actions in forest management:

  • Long term planning of forest operations (30 yrs horizon)
  • Knowing your forest; digital dynamic inventory of the total standing stock, its age distribution, and their development over 30 yrs
  • Digital management and tracable execution of all operations
  • Optimization the growth of the forest as part of the ecosystem 


Of course we have to understand that in Europe alone we have very different forests. Not all forests can be utilized commercially the same way. Forests as well play different roles in the ecosystem in different areas. Nordic forests are prime example of how commercial forestry has not disturbed the ecosystem equilibrium. Forestry is not threatening ecosystem equilibrium everywhere. The essential is to understand where and how commercial forestry is threatening ecosystem equilibrium. And take decisions accordingly; sometimes forests can help to bring the ecosystem back to equilibrium, sometimes forests are essential source of raw material in order to reduce the in take of fossile carbon. 
This is the essential part of our capabilities; to understand what is the role of the forests and why.

~ Elina Kalela; CEO and Partner Aari Forest

How to combine sustainability and biomass use in the framework of bioeconomy in the context of economic growth? Isn't it clear that bioeconomy and sustainability are not compatible with infinite growth?

It is clear, that some of the economical features of industrial era - e.g. continuously growing utilization of non-renewable raw materials - cannot continue eternally. We can state that industrial era has come to its end in Europe, but not in other parts of the world, such as in China, whose raw material resources we europeans still like to use in increasingly volumes, for example as batteries for our „green“ transition. How to cope with the various consequences of decreasing production of goods and energy containing fossile carbon in long term is a huge question, which we can not tackle with either using biomass economically or not. Other issues, for example increasing the degree of circulation of products and goods, play a significant role in reducing the overall consumption of virgin raw materials. New value chains will arise, providing value growth without simultaneously increasing volumetric usage of non renewable raw materials. A good example of this development is the economical usage of forests: when we look at the trees we should see cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, providing renewable carbon as a raw material to thousands of medicals, chemicals and other goods. Not just timber, pulp and paper/board.

Part of the solution, which we can ourself implement, is the optimization of the growth and usage of the biomass available from European forests. 

 

~ Elina Kalela; CEO and Partner Aari Forest

 

Remaining questions panel 2

How do you propose to monitor and reward good practice in biodiversity-friendly management?

Basically, we want to evolve the existing CO2-market, which is based on mere compensation promises, towards CO2- and Biodiversity-markets, which are based upon measured success/outcomes of management.

In our AMARENA-project, we will monitor good practice in biodiversity-friendly forest management by combining i) scientifically accepted indicators for measuring biodiversity with ii) new digital technologies that allow to measure these indicators in both an accurate and cheap way. Our goal is to monitor the actual outcome (success) of biodiversity-friendly forest management.

Monitoring creates the basis for a new business model that rewards good practice in biodiversity-friendly management (side note: the same holds true for CO2-compensation, but here I focus on the biodiversity-aspect of our project).

Our approach is based on three main assumptions:

  1. Corporates needing to fulfill their CSR-obligations are desperately looking for greenwashing-resistant solutions that are less prone to scandals than current CO2-markets.
  2. A greenwashing-resistant business model should reward “measured outcome”, not “compensation promises” that lie in the future.
  3. Anything that can be measured, can be insured. Therefore, insurance companies can become major actors and provide quality checks in the field of environmental markets.

We want to create a business model where forest managers become able to offer contracts to corporates in which they promise to provide agreed upon levels of biodiversity-improvement and CO2-compensation. The forest management measures needed to provide these outcomes will be financed via these contracts. The success of the outcome of these forest management measures will be insured by insurance companies.

 

~ Dr. Benjamin Kowalski; Head of Science FFI

How do we avoid the trap of being caught in the decade-long discussion on how to best measure biodiversity?

Our basic idea: it is better to implement a non-ideal solution that is working today and that is based on a continuous improvement process than wait for a perfect solutions that may never be implemented.

Therefore, we aim to create a minimum viable product (MVP) / business model for rewarding biodiversity-friendly forest management. By doing so, we want to accelerate the change towards biodiversity-friendly forest ecosystems. Once our MVP has proven to be working, we will implement a continuous improvement process (as known from quality management) that is driven by competing market actors and that leads to the continuous inclusion of new technologies and better indicators for measuring biodiversity. This means we will try to use the power of the market to increase the speed of the improvement process. However, we have to make sure this “improvement process” is institutionalized and will remain a central aspect of our approach.

 

~ Dr. Benjamin Kowalski; Head of Science FFI

How important are independent verification and paying for outcomes (not just practices) to maturity of eco-system service markets?

Finding the answer to this will be a main task of the coming year(s). Independent verification will probably be a central aspect, but there are open questions surrounding the actual implementation:

  • Cost-Effectiveness: Will we find (smartphone-based?) technologies that allow foresters to monitor their own progress in a transparent way (supported by remote-sensing based verification by a neutral third party) or will we need independent “boots on the ground”?
  • Fairness: When measuring outcomes instead of inputs (= practices), how do we separate the positive outcome of good management practice from the potentially negative outcome of e.g. extreme weather events that negate any positive outcome achieved by the forest manager? Will we ever be able to ignore “practice” and focus solely on “outcome”?
  • Continuous improvement process: total transparency about the outcome of practices is needed, but natural disturbances and natural fluctuations in the state of ecosystems can blur the outcome of forest management practices. How can we increase acceptance and understanding both of corporates and the public on the complexity of this issue? How can we make sure that continuous improvement processes become an integral part of future environmental markets?

 

~ Dr. Benjamin Kowalski; Head of Science FFI

 

 
About the conference — Further impressions and information about the conference via the official website of the European Landowners' Organizsaiton (ELO)
Tags:
events
Post by Future Forest Initiative
Mai 4, 2024